Sadia Hussain
Not long ago, it was in those days last year that the Indian government issued an order declaring two Articles 370 and 15-A of the Indian Constitution ineffective. As a result, an unsuccessful attempt was made to change the legal status of occupied Kashmir. Modi government's policy makers felt utterly unaware of the fact (or they deliberately misrepresented themselves) that Occupied Kashmir is a disputed territory, the issue of which was raised by the Indian government itself at the United Nations
more or less 70 years ago. Was gone Three times in recent years, the UN Security Council has taken diplomatic action on the issue of Occupied Kashmir in one form or another. Meanwhile, the people of the Valley protested against this illegal and criminal move of the Modi government. So the occupying Indian army has practically cut off the valley from the rest of the world and surrounded the people there and this has been going on for a year. The situation has reached to the point that even the internet
service in the occupied valley has been shut down. Even ordinary tourists are not allowed to enter the valley, let alone access to local or foreign media. It is no longer a secret that the Modi government, under a well-laid plan and a deep conspiracy, made the two articles ineffective so that non-Kashmiris could be voluntarily resettled in occupied Kashmir. One proof of this plan and conspiracy is that so far more than two lakh houses have been built there where non-Kashmiris are settling. Attractive incentives are being given to these people for this purpose and one of the reasons given is that these people
migrated from the valley in 1947 and now they are returning. Thousands of state domiciles have been issued in this regard, the legal status of which is not accepted by the Kashmiri guerrilla leadership. One view is that it is the Israeli government that is paving the way for this illegal and anti-peace plan, which has used similar methods and tactics to keep Palestinians away from their homeland and to gain a foothold in Palestinian territory. ? For the interest and information of the readers, it is written that Modi Sarkari did not stop his illegal and unconstitutional actions here but according to Azad Kashmir President
Masood Khan, “The Administrative Council of Occupied Kashmir has approved the proposal that control The Building Operations Act 1988 and the Development Act 1970 should be amended so that the areas required by the Indian Army can be declared as a "strategic area" and handed over to the Indian Army. The puppet administration already owns 243 hectares of land to the Indian Army. In the past, a large
area of 21,400 hectares was declared strategic and handed over to the Indian Army. Under the new rules, the people of the valley, and especially Muslims, are now being forcibly relocated. ” The oppressed people of the valley have practically no contact with the world outside the valley but still somehow the besieged Kashmiris keep informing the civilized world about the fragility and turmoil of their situation. Such reports highlight this fact. There are 900,000 Indian troops in Occupied Kashmir and if this number is compared with the total number of people in the Occupied Valley under the average formula, the astonishing fact is revealed that there are eight such Indians on an oppressed and unarmed
Kashmiri. Soldiers have been deployed who have modern weapons and all kinds of facilities. This situation also encourages the occupying forces to treat the beleagured Kashmiris as they see fit instead of the law and order. That is why there has been an incident in recent days where Indian troops have not only shot an unarmed elder. He was martyred and his teenage son was seated on the chest of his body and his pictures and videos were taken. The scene went viral on social media all over the world
and was strongly condemned by the civilized world but had no effect on the Modi government. A strong voice was heard in the recent session of the US Congress against such illegal actions and brutal atrocities of the Indian government. He strongly condemned the rulers of New Delhi for serious human rights violations, including lack of access to international media, blockade of internet and mobile services, and non-delivery of medical equipment for the corona virus.
