Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Corps Commander reviews border security arrangements during visit
    • Kashmiri think-tank felicitates Iran’s newly elected Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei
    • Pakistan Condemns Israel’s Strikes on Lebanon as Displacement Nears 700,000
    • PM Shehbaz Congratulates Mojtaba Khamenei on Becoming Iran’s New Supreme Leader
    • Overnight rains lash Occupied Srinagar, other IIOJ&K parts; more precipitation predicted
    • WAPDA’s Dams Committee Reviews Land Acquisition, Resettlement of Diamer Basha Dam
    • UNDP and Ministry of Human Rights launch Pakistan’s first National Strategy on Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence
    • Family Car plunges into dam near Rawalakot; children miraculously survive body
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Daily Parliament Times
    Subscribe
    Wednesday, March 11
    • Home
    • E-Paper
    • International
    • Diplomatic
    • National
    • Kashmir
    • Balochistan
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Sports
    • Editorial
    • Metro
    • Live
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Daily Parliament Times
    Home»Opinion»Rise in Interest Rates and its Implications
    Opinion

    Rise in Interest Rates and its Implications

    November 27, 2022No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Dr. Atiq ur Rehman
    On November 25, the State Bank of Pakistan’s Monetary Policy Committee further increased the policy rate by one percentage point and said in a statement that the hike was aimed at controlling rising inflation. The logic behind the efforts to reduce inflation by increasing the interest rate is that the increase in the interest rate will reduce the overall demand and due to this, inflation will decrease. On the other hand, the State Bank in its monetary policy statement is admitting that the recent wave of inflation is largely driven by prices of international commodities. Prices of imported goods cannot be influenced by the domestic market of Pakistan. Rather, it is not easy for any country to influence the global market individually. Suppose a large country and large economy like India decides to increase interest rates to reduce inflation, driven mainly by the price of petrol. Suppose historical data indicates that a one percent decrease in the demand for gasoline in the world market can lead to a two percent decrease in the price of gasoline. To achieve this two percent reduction in the price of petrol, India has to reduce the overall demand in the global market by one percent. Despite being a large economy, India’s share in the global market is only 7%, so, if India reduces the demand for petrol in its domestic market by 14%, the demand for petrol in the global market will decrease by 1%, which will reduce the price of petrol to the desired level. For developing economies, a difference of one or two percent in inflation is meaningless. The difference in inflation will be considered significant when there is a reduction of around 5% and for this the demand for petrol in the domestic market will have to be reduced by 75%. Is it possible for a developing country to reduce its demand for petrol by 75%? Pakistan’s share in the world market is very less than that of India. Pakistan’s share in the total economic activity of the world is only 0.3%. Even if Pakistan shuts down its economy completely, it will make a difference of only 0.3% in the world market. In such a case, how is it possible to reduce import-based inflation by means of interest rates? Based on these same arguments, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz wrote an article in 2008, arguing against raising interest rates to control inflation. According to Stiglitz, controlling inflation through monetary policy is effective only for those economies that have a significant share in the overall world market. Small economies will always fail in trying to reduce inflation through monetary policy. After June 2021, more than a hundred nations of the world tried to reduce inflation by increasing interest rates. So far, no single nation has been successful in bringing down inflation significantly among these countries. Controlling inflation by reducing demand has proven to be futile, but on the contrary, there are many other channels that are relatively more effective and indicate that a rise in interest rates leads to a rise in inflation. At current interest rates, it has become almost impossible for a new entrepreneur to get a loan, and the supply of credit to existing businesses has also decreased. A decrease in the supply of business credit leads to increased inflation. For example, the recent floods caused enormous damage to agriculture. The easiest way to revive agriculture was to give farmers enough and cheap loans to resume production. But at the current rate of interest, no farmer would want to take any loan. Therefore, there will be a decrease in agricultural production in the coming season and this decrease in supply will cause an increase in inflation. In the current financial year, an amount of more than 4000 billion has been reserved for the interest payments on the federal government debt, which is about 42 percent of the total budget. An increase in interest rates will cause the amount of payable interest to increase further and the government will need to levy more taxes to cover these additional interest payments, which will further increase inflation. As stated above, the current government allocated more than 4000 billion for interest payments in the budget. When the budget was prepared, the interest rate was 13.75 percent, which has now been increased by another 2.25 percent. Due to this increase, the amount required to pay the interest will also increase, and about 4500 billion will be spent this year. As mentioned in the latest monetary policy statement and other monetary policy statements before, the main purpose of such a high interest rate is to control inflation. But the most surprising fact is that the State Bank whose policy causes all these are expenses, and the State Bank does not have any analytical report of these expenses so that the benefit of these expenses could be estimated. Project Inflation Control costing more than double the defense budget, Pakistan’s most expensive and failed project, has never been audited.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related

    Roadmap for the Kashmiri Diaspora to Highlight the Kashmir Issue at the Global Level

    March 10, 2026

    Israeli Influence at Pakistan’s Doorstep: The Real Aim Behind the Attack on Iran

    March 10, 2026

    Superpower Belongs Only to Allah, Israel-US-Imposed Unjust War, and the Historical Continuity of the Leadership Position

    March 10, 2026

    Erosion of Kashmiri Voices from State Hierarchy

    March 9, 2026

    The New Fire in the Middle East

    March 9, 2026

    Humanity, Literature, and Contemporary Global Challenges

    March 9, 2026

    Latest News

    National / International

    • Corps Commander reviews border security arrangements during visit
    • Kashmiri think-tank felicitates Iran’s newly elected Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei
    • Pakistan Condemns Israel’s Strikes on Lebanon as Displacement Nears 700,000
    • PM Shehbaz Congratulates Mojtaba Khamenei on Becoming Iran’s New Supreme Leader
    • Overnight rains lash Occupied Srinagar, other IIOJ&K parts; more precipitation predicted
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    • Home
    • E-Paper
    • International
    • Diplomatic
    • National
    • Kashmir
    • Balochistan
    • Business
    • Opinion
    • Sports
    • Editorial
    • Metro
    • Live
    © 2026 Designed by Chunk Labs. Hosted on Host Chacho

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.